Smart city is finding its way into public discourse. Simply put, smart city refers to making good use of advanced information technology architecture to address urban issues and enhance the quality of life in a community.
It may manifest itself in more efficient and responsive public services, a more tech-savvy citizenry and a cleaner environment, among other things.
In his policy address in January, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying unveiled plans to develop a smart city in Kowloon East.
We are working on very interesting Internet of Things projects and the feeling is always that lawyers are involved at the very late stage when the product is already completed and ready to be launched in the very next days. At that stage a “negotiation” between the legal team and the technical and commercial teams starts on what changes can be implemented without requiring further developments/costs, what risks should be taken, and whenever lawyers raise an issue, the technical and commercial teams have almost a “heart attack“…
The Cité de l'Objet Connecté in Angers, France, is designed to help companies commercialize products for the Internet of Things.
California's Silicon Valley enjoys a reputation as the world's center for tech innovation. For manufacturing, it's Shenzhen, China. But if some private investors and the French government get their way, a quiet city in western France will claim some influence in both those domains.
Mining industries will be disrupted by the transition to a circular economy, a model that aims to cycle technical and biological materials in the economy perpetually, rather than extracting materials and resources from finite raw feedstocks.
The Internet of Things (IoT) provides an opportunity for the mining industry helping to creative more effective and less damaging processes. As an industry, mining is typically manual labour intensive, but that could soon change with several companies identifying the possibilities of big data and IoT connected machinery.
Jun 12, 2015— Would you implant a chip in your brain in order to quickly and easily access the Internet? Nearly half of the people who attended a future-focused session at the Cisco Live! conference, held this week in San Diego, Calif., said they would.
Joseph Bradley, Cisco's Internet of Everything (IoE) evangelist and VP of the networking giant's IoE Practice Consulting Services (CCS), had posed the question as a way of talking about how his 2015 resolution was to "embrace his Millennial-ness." In line with that resolution, he indicated that he'd take the implant, too.
Consumers appear to be growing more optimistic about the IoT in the near future. Thirty-one percent said they believe a "fully connected smart home" will be achievable in the next year, while 60% say it's possible within five years, according to the survey.
How the market gets to that point, however, remains to be seen. The survey delved into consumers' preferences and trepidations about the smart home. Based on how consumers responded to the survey, here's what the market should keep in mind when trying to bring consumers on board the Internet of Things
I recently have been sounding ahead-of-the-curve executives about the questions we should be asking about the future. Here are five of particular importance.
Do you understand that it’s the transition, not the trajectory?
As someone who studies the history of the future (that is, how organizations have historically tried to prepare themselves for what comes after what comes next), I have learned that it is critically important to differentiate between technology trajectory stories and technology transition realities.
I wanted it to work. I wanted to fall in love, like so many of my friends. “It takes a while,” they said. “Don’t expect a coup de foudre. Let it build over time.”
So I did. I knew other people looked at what I had with envy. But a month and a half after we first got together, I have decided it is time to — well, call time.
I am breaking up with my Apple Watch. The relationship was, despite all expectations, not what I needed. All the focus on San Francisco and Apple’s next big innovation this week (streaming!) made me realize it was not playing my tune.
We could be heading for a "Maoist style" future where our devices routinely spy and report on us if we do not set up proper privacy controls now, according to Jos Creese, president of BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT.
Although ubiquitous internet-connected devices can bring huge environmental, public safety and health benefits, without safeguards the threats they could pose to personal freedom are huge, he said at a Local Digital Futures event this week.
As more connected products come to market, from smart thermostats on our walls to connected wearables on our wrists, how will we pay for it?
Will we sign contracts as we do with mobile phones, getting hardware for “free” and paying for services? Or will we get discounts or free devices by handing over our personal data, as we do with Google and Facebook?
Speaking at the World Business Forum in Sydney, Australia, Wozniak said, "I feel it's kind of like a bubble, because there is a pace at which human beings can change the way they do things." He pointed out there were "tons of companies starting up," but that some might have overestimated the appeal of connecting everyday objects to the Internet.
Automotive technology started with pistons and powertrains, and recently cars have increasingly relied on advanced electronics hardware. We’re now seeing the latest shift in the car’s evolution: the software defined car. Last week, Tesla gave us a great glimpse of what the future of automotive will be like. This is the beginning of a major opportunity as well as a fundamental disruption to existing ways of automobile thinking. Like all disruptive technologies, those who can’t quickly embrace it are destined to fade into obscurity.
Critical infrastructures can be monitored in real time thanks to learning systems that use intelligent data evaluation processes. Lives could be saved by a new early warning system that knows what keeps levees together.
When the RISC movement surfaced in 1982, researchers analyzed UNIX to discover what instructions multi-user code was actually using, and then designed an instruction set and execution pipeline to do that better. Fewer instructions meant fewer transistors, which led to less power consumption - although in the original Berkeley RISC disclosure, the word "watts" never appears. Even during the early development of ARM, lower power consumption was completely serendipitous.
The Internet of Things is hard to track. As I point out in Pax Technica, what makes it hard to estimate the size of the Internet of Things (IoT) is the fact that the addressing system for devices is changing. The Carna Bot found 1.3 billion devices with an IPv4 address in 2012. Engineers expect so many of these connected devices that they have reconfigured the addressing system to allow for 2 to the 128th power addresses–enough for each atom on the face of the earth to have 100 Internet addresses.